On the connection of “butch” women and development

Well, it’s sort of complicated.

As a self-identity, it wasn’t just associated with lesbians, but a
specific lesbian subculture in the 30′s-60′s.  In that context it was
also associated with class and education politics, as many butches
worked in factories and hung out in working-class bars.  The term was
also associated with race, as there was, and is, a strong butch
tradition in the African-American lesbian community (as well as
similar traditions in other lesbian communities around the world.)
For a good description of the history of butch/femme culture in the
lesbian community I suggest The Persistent Desire. a collection of
various writings over the last 130 years from around the world.

In the past 10-20 years, it has become associated with both people who
don’t identify primarily with “female” or “male” gender identity
(suggested reading: “Butch is a Noun” by S. Bear) and simultaneously
with class-specific retro lesbian culture (frequently involving crew
cuts and motorcycles).  At the same time, other forms of female
masculinity have sprung up.  Especially with biker culture, it
overlaps with gender-varient heterosexual women, but “butch” as it is
used in the lesbian community has significantly more history (and
controversy) associated with it.  (I’m purposefully skipping over the
controversy bits for this summery.)

So what does working class lesbian identity have to do with geeky
culture?  In general, I don’t think it has all that much to do with
it.  Geeky culture has always pretty much embraced the male gaze, and
all the early evidence I can find of women in computer science and
technical professions emphasizes feminine clothing and presentation.
Early conference pictures might involve short hair cuts, but unless
they were in military uniforms they also wore skirts.  If you look at
the pictures in the Apple Folklore gallery
(http://folklore.org/ProjectView.py?project=Macintosh&gallery=1), they
look about the same as the women on the TV show Thirty Something
(approximately contemporary.)  I haven’t been able to find any early
evidence of gender presentation in computer science that didn’t mirror
gender presentation outside of computer science.

When the backlash against comfortable, er, I mean, the reemergence of
hyper-feminine clothing in the 90′s, femme presentation also reemerges
in computer science photos and day-to-day outfits of female coders I
knew.  Lots of turtlenecks, pants suits and other clearly-feminine
clothing became common, even in casual environments.  Conference
t-shirts were still paired with jeans, but in those cases it seemed to
be mostly a case of conference organizers ignoring women all together
and at least where I lived this was common among many younger women.

The one connection I’ve been able to find between butch culture and
STEM is that there were some butches who worked in some electronic
factories, and GBLT rights emerged early in some STEM companies (AT&T
Bell Labs, for example, had an early gay and lesbian employee group).

Actually, there is one other connection: men redefining masculinity.
For example, the one programmer on Butch Labs (a compilation of
butches), also identifies as male:
http://www.butchlab.com/john-gagon-butch-mini-interview/ There has
been a strong tradition of geeky men redefining masculinity, though
usually in ways that ignore the hundreds of years of history of
masculine women doing just that *cough*.  Nevertheless, starting (as
far as I’ve been able to find evidence) in the 80s there were lots of
ponytails, tight t-shirts and jeans and some self-identification as
“butch” or other unconventionally-masculine terms among men writing
software and building technology.

So mostly I wonder how much of these assumptions are held by anyone
but women ourselves.  In a field that most often ignores us all
together, there is a waiting stereotype of “butch”, and nevermind that
it was created by and inhabited by men.  I am butch (own a motorcycle,
have a lovely collection of fedoras, adore my bowties), and so I don’t
want to over-project my own experience onto other women, but I do
wonder how much of the perceived pressure to be “butch” is really
pressure to be a guy.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to On the connection of “butch” women and development

  1. Kyle says:

    Although I didn’t say so in my list of self-descriptive words, I’m a software developer — 20+ years in the field. I’m a user group leader (.NET developers) as well as the regional Membership Mentor for our national organization. I’ve been pondering my role as a model of alternative masculinity in my geek communities. A few of the top speakers and most sought after authors in the .NET developer community are women, feminine presenting, straight identified. In my user group, there are a few women, but none that I’d tag with the butch label. Though the numbers of women I see at developer conferences and within technical work groups has grown over the years, the number of butches and genderqueers has not.

    I’m glad to have a chance to further awareness of trans masculinity in my technical communities. To your question of whether butches in this industry are bowing to pressure to be more male in order to succeed, I don’t find that to be my motivation but I also realize that my success as a masculine individual might seem to follow the stereotype.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s